Who it is for

Built

Orders, results and billing that agree with each other.

A test catalog you control, results entered against real orders, a pending-work report, and reports printed with your branding.

A phlebotomist labeling a sample tube at the collection counter of a diagnostic center.
All segments

A diagnostic center lives or dies on turnaround and on not losing samples. Software helps with the first by making the worklist honest, and with the second only if it tracks the sample, which is the part worth asking every vendor about.

What is built

The order-to-result spine, and the billing that follows it.

  • A test catalog with your own prices
  • Orders as a worklist, from a consultation or raised directly
  • Result entry with reference ranges
  • A pending-results report, so nothing sits unclaimed
  • Reports and lab order documents printed with your branding
  • Referring-doctor records, so you know where work comes from
  • Billing on the same record as the order

What a larger lab will ask for

And will not find here yet.

  • Barcode accessioning and sample tracking(planned)
  • Bidirectional analyzer interfacing(planned)
  • Critical-value alerting(planned)
  • Pathologist sign-off on the report(planned)
  • Quality control charting and reagent lot tracking(planned)
  • Home collection and phlebotomy routing(planned)
  • Report dispatch over WhatsApp(planned)

What this does not do

This suits a diagnostic center whose problem is that orders, results and billing live in different places. It does not yet suit a lab running NABL accreditation or an analyzer fleet: there is no accessioning, no analyzer interfacing, no quality-control charting and no pathologist sign-off step. Results are typed in. If that is a dealbreaker, it should be one now rather than after a migration.

Questions we are asked

Can it talk to our analyzers?

Not today. HL7 and ASTM interfacing is planned and will be entitled per device, because building it for machines no customer owns would be waste.

Are you NABL compliant?

Accreditation belongs to your laboratory, not to our software. Several things an assessment looks for are scheduled rather than built, and we would rather say so.

How do reports reach the referring doctor?

Printed, and through the portal. Message dispatch is planned.

Can we track which doctor refers the most work?

Referrals are recorded in and out. Analysis of them is thin today and improves with the reporting work.

See it running with your own workflows.

Book a walkthrough and we will map your clinic or hospital onto the platform, module by module.