Guide
Digital claims, from eligibility to settlement.
What the National Health Claims Exchange changes for a hospital, what it does not, and the operational work that sits underneath a “cashless” promise.
10 minute read · Updated 07/09/2026
The National Health Claims Exchange is a common gateway for exchanging insurance claims in a standard format, so a hospital submits once instead of learning a different portal for every payer. It changes how claims move; it does not change what a payer decides.
The problem it is trying to solve
A hospital dealing with a dozen payers today deals with a dozen processes: different portals, different formats, different documentation demands, different people to chase. The cost is not the software license. It is the staff time, and the working capital tied up in claims nobody can find.
NHCX standardizes the exchange. Claims move in a common format, status is queryable, and the same submission works across payers who are on the exchange. That is a genuine operational improvement and it is worth understanding precisely, because it is also routinely oversold.
The lifecycle, stage by stage
Six stages, and the hospital’s work is concentrated in two of them.
- Eligibility
- Confirming the patient is covered and for what. Faster through the exchange than a phone call, but only as good as the data the payer holds.
- Pre-authorization
- The treatment plan and estimated cost, submitted before treatment where the policy requires it. This is where most delay happens and most rejections originate.
- Treatment and documentation
- Your clinical record has to support the claim. A claim fails on documentation far more often than on eligibility.
- Claim submission
- The itemized bill, clinical documents and discharge summary, mapped to standard codes.
- Adjudication
- The payer decides. Queries come back through the same channel rather than by phone, which is the real change.
- Settlement and reconciliation
- Payment against submitted claims, matched automatically rather than by spreadsheet.
What actually changes for your billing desk
Less portal-hopping, and a status you can look up rather than chase. Queries arrive as structured messages instead of phone calls, and reconciliation stops being a monthly spreadsheet exercise.
What does not change: the payer still decides, the policy still governs, and a claim with poor documentation still fails. If your rejections today are mostly documentation, a gateway will not fix them. It will only tell you faster.
PMJAY is a scheme, not a technology
Ayushman Bharat PMJAY is a government health insurance scheme with defined packages and rates. NHCX is the pipe through which claims can travel. They are frequently spoken about as one thing and they are not.
A hospital empanelled under PMJAY has scheme obligations, including package rates, treatment protocols and documentation, that exist whether or not the claim travels through a modern exchange.
Prerequisites, in the order they bite
Most of these are ABDM prerequisites, which is not a coincidence.
- Facility registration
- You need an identity in the Health Facility Registry before anything can be attributed to you.
- Registered professionals
- Clinical documents supporting a claim are signed by someone, and the exchange cares who.
- Coded services
- Your service catalog has to map to standard codes. This is unglamorous data work and it is where projects stall.
- Documentation discipline
- A discharge summary that a payer accepts is a clinical-record problem before it is an integration problem.
Our position
Nirogix does not have claims integration today. There is no insurance module, no pre-authorization workflow and no NHCX connectivity in the product. It is scheduled in the phase that adds the connected and regulated capabilities, alongside WhatsApp and telemedicine.
A hospital whose primary pain is cashless claims should not buy Nirogix this quarter, and we would rather say so on a web page than at the end of a procurement process.
Questions this raises
Do we need NHCX to run cashless claims?
No. Existing payer processes continue to work. NHCX is a better path, not the only one.
Will it get us paid faster?
It removes some delay: chasing status, re-submitting in a different format, reconciling by hand. It does not change how long a payer takes to decide, or fix a claim that is poorly documented.
What is the biggest cause of claim rejection?
Documentation, consistently. The clinical record does not support what was billed, or the discharge summary does not say what the payer needs it to say. That is a clinical-record problem, not a gateway problem.
Does Nirogix support NHCX today?
No. It is scheduled, and there is no claims capability in the product at present.
Related
Other guides
ABDM and ABHA: what a hospital actually has to do
What the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission asks of a hospital, in the order the steps actually block each other, and what “ABDM ready” does and does not mean when a vendor says it.
NABH accreditation: what software can and cannot do for you
Where a hospital information system genuinely helps an NABH assessment, where it is irrelevant, and why no vendor can sell you compliance.
The DPDP Act for hospitals: what changes at the front desk
What India’s data protection law asks of a hospital, which obligations land on your software and which land on your processes, and the questions worth putting to any vendor.
How to choose hospital software without being sold to
The questions that separate systems that work from systems that demo well, including the ones that are uncomfortable for us.
See it running with your own workflows.
Book a walkthrough and we will map your clinic or hospital onto the platform, module by module.